Observatoire d’éthique universitaire
Menu

Agatha Christie classics latest to be rewritten for modern sensitivities

Agatha Christie classics latest to be rewritten for modern sensitivities

Collectif

Tribune des observateurs

Table des matières

Agatha Christie classics latest to be rewritten for modern sensitivities

Read More  The new editions of Christie’s works are set to be released or have been released since 2020 by HarperCollins, which is said by insiders to use the services of sensitivity readers. It has created new editions of the entire run of Miss Marple mysteries and selected Poirot novels.  Digital versions of new editions seen by The Telegraph include scores of changes to texts written from 1920 to 1976, stripping them of numerous passages containing descriptions, insults or references to ethnicity, particularly for characters Christie’s protagonists encounter outside the UK.The author’s own narration, often through the inner monologue of Miss Jane Marple or Hercule Poirot, has been altered in many instances. Sections of dialogue uttered by often unsympathetic characters within the mysteries have also been cut.In the 1937 Poirot novel Death on the Nile, the character of Mrs Allerton complains that a group of children are pestering her, saying that “they come back and stare, and stare, and their eyes are simply disgusting, and so are their noses, and I don’t believe I really like children”.This has been stripped down in a new edition to state: “They come back and stare, and stare. And I don’t believe I really like children”.Vocabulary has also been altered, with the term “Oriental” removed. Other descriptions have been altered in some instances, with a black servant, originally described as grinning as he understands the need to stay silent about an incident, described as neither black nor smiling but simply as “nodding”. 

The new editions of Christie’s works are set to be released or have been released since 2020 by HarperCollins, which is said by insiders to use the services of sensitivity readers. It has created new editions of the entire run of Miss Marple mysteries and selected Poirot novels.  

Digital versions of new editions seen by The Telegraph include scores of changes to texts written from 1920 to 1976, stripping them of numerous passages containing descriptions, insults or references to ethnicity, particularly for characters Christie’s protagonists encounter outside the UK.

The author’s own narration, often through the inner monologue of Miss Jane Marple or Hercule Poirot, has been altered in many instances. Sections of dialogue uttered by often unsympathetic characters within the mysteries have also been cut.

In the 1937 Poirot novel Death on the Nile, the character of Mrs Allerton complains that a group of children are pestering her, saying that “they come back and stare, and stare, and their eyes are simply disgusting, and so are their noses, and I don’t believe I really like children”.

This has been stripped down in a new edition to state: “They come back and stare, and stare. And I don’t believe I really like children”.

Vocabulary has also been altered, with the term “Oriental” removed. Other descriptions have been altered in some instances, with a black servant, originally described as grinning as he understands the need to stay silent about an incident, described as neither black nor smiling but simply as “nodding”.

 

« Ce post est un relevé d’information de notre veille d’information »

Auteur

Collectif

Tribune des observateurs

Toutes ses publications

[side_notes]

Droit de réponse et contributions
Vous souhaitez réagir ? Soumettez une proposition de tribune

Vous pourriez aimer aussi :

Retour sur le colloque « La Palestine et l’Europe : poids du passé et dynamiques contemporaines »

L'annulation d'un colloque est-elle souhaitable? Deux positions argumentées par deux membres de l'Observatoire.

La liberté académique malmenée : d’une affaire Jason Arday à une affaire Nathan Cofnas

Les affaires Jason Arday et Nathan Cofnas montrent comment les universités, invoquant tour à tour inclusion ou déontologie (mais pas la liberté académique), évitent d’assumer leurs propres responsabilités. Après avoir examiné les travaux controversés de Cofnas, notamment sur l’hérédité de l’intelligence, Jacques Robert juge certaines de ses positions très discutables sur les plans scientifique et éthique, mais estime qu’elles relèvent néanmoins de la liberté académique.
Ce qu'il vous reste à lire
0 %

Peut-être devriez-vous vous abonner ?

Sinon, ce n’est pas grave ! Vous pouvez fermer cette fenêtre et continuer votre lecture.

    S'enregistrer: