Nathalie Heinich / Jean Baubérot, The Tears of Secularism / Disputatio

Nathalie Heinich / Jean Baubérot, The Tears of Secularism / Disputatio

Collective

Observers' Tribune

Table of contents

Nathalie Heinich / Jean Baubérot, The Tears of Secularism / Disputatio

Read more  "Secularism leads to intense controversies," recalls historian and sociologist Jean Baubérot at the start of this heated correspondence with sociologist Nathalie Heinich. Their exchanges confirm this.
This jewel of French identity is the subject of violent disputes constantly rekindled by current events: from burkinis to hijabeuses – female footballers demanding the wearing of the veil – controversies that do not oppose secularists and anti-secularists but one secularism to another. In the name of which secularism are we speaking? What secularism do we want to defend? 

"Secularism leads to intense controversies," recalls historian and sociologist Jean Baubérot at the start of this heated correspondence with sociologist Nathalie Heinich. Their exchanges confirm this.

This jewel of French identity is the subject of violent disputes constantly rekindled by current events: from burkinis to hijabeuses – female footballers demanding the wearing of the veil – controversies that do not oppose secularists and anti-secularists but one secularism to another. In the name of which secularism are we speaking? What secularism do we want to defend?

 

"This post is a summary of information from our information monitoring"

Author

Right of reply and contributions
Would you like to respond? Submit an opinion piece proposal

You might also like:

As a feminist, I was “cancelled”

Marie-Jo Bonnet denounces the censorship she faces within feminist and LGBT activist circles for expressing critical positions on marriage, medically assisted procreation for lesbians, and gender transition, which she considers to be normative responses to social and identity-based malaise. The new progressive norms are becoming instruments of exclusion, censorship, and the falsification of history, under the guise of defending minorities.

The false path of intellectuals: between social conformism and ideological blindness

Why do intellectuals, despite being trained in critical thinking, persist in serious ideological errors? In his latest essay, Samuel Fitoussi shows how an educated elite can impose erroneous dogmas on society as a whole without facing the consequences. A review by Emmanuelle Hénin.
What you have left to read
0 %

Maybe you should subscribe?

Otherwise, it's okay! You can close this window and continue reading.

    Register: