Matrimonies and experimental patrimonializations of “nature”…

Matrimonies and experimental patrimonializations of “nature”…

Collective

Observers' Tribune

Table of contents

Matrimonies and experimental patrimonializations of “nature”…

Read moreThe LIEU network, the AMUP laboratory, the SAGE laboratory and IFRA Nigeria are pleased to invite you to the 3rd day of the 2022-23 traveling conference: Minority heritage #3. Matrimonies and experimental heritage of “nature” in the city. Argument This third study day, part of critical heritage studies, is part of an interdisciplinary research cycle devoted to ""Minority" Heritage: epistemological issues, fields and emerging questions" (RESEAU LIEU, AMUP-ENSAS, SAGE-University of Strasbourg, IFRA-Nigeria) (2022-2024). Within the paradigm of “fragile omnipatrimonialization” (M. Gravari-Barbas, 2014) are developing fundamentally plural and increasingly diversified heritage, while the typologies likely to constitute heritage are multiplying. However, not all heritage sites have the same social status or benefit from the same recognition. This cycle proposes to shift the focus from the era of the “all heritage” of falsely consensual appearance (M. Gravari-Barbas, V. Veschambre, 2003), “beyond the heritage consensus” (J. Bondaz, C. Isnart, A. Leblon, 2012), and to question the notion of “minority” heritage (B. Morovich, 2022). This notion comes from a transfer to the heritage field of the notion of “minority group”, or rather of the relationship between a dominant group and minorities, developed by the sociologist Colette Guillaumin (1985). By questioning heritage through minority or unfinished processes, we will also evoke the notions of heritage arena (Roth, 2003; Givre, 2012) or cultural arena (Morovich, 2021) in order to put them to the test in contexts of urban, political, social and now health upheaval. These arenas are developing particularly in cities, where culture and heritage are confronted with metropolization, an urban translation of the new stage of globalization (Djament-Tran and San Marco, 2014).   The first two days of study highlighted two emerging heritage themes to which the third will be devoted: matrimonial properties and the heritage of “nature” in the city.  It was within the framework of the examination of ethnological collections through the critical lens of subaltern studies, mentioned during the second study day, that the anthropologist Ellen Hertz (2002) updated the medieval term matrimoine (property inherited from the mother), with the aim of rethinking our heritage in feminist terms and generating new heritage regimes. At the same time, Aurore Evain (2001, 2006) highlighted theatrical matrimony. Contemporary environmental issues are leading us to rethink the heritage-making of "nature" and/or landscape, historically constructed by the sensitive naturalist paradigm in connection with processes of artialization (Roger, 1997), which will lead us to revisit the role of artists in "minority" heritage-making.  Matrimony will allow us to address the heritage of “gendered” minorities, but also in a much broader sense, “a territorialized, anchored heritage, which retains its value of existence but” which “also has a value of use” (Gravari-Barbas, 2014). Similarly, the "minority", "everyday" and/or protest experiences of the heritage of "nature" in the city will be addressed, both in Western and non-Western cities, not only as a type of heritage (or infra-heritage (Guitard, 2021)), whose opposition to "cultural" heritage must be overcome, but as a transversal questioning of the contemporary heritage paradigm. Marked by trends towards the patrimonialization of the living (Micoud, 2000) and by the challenges of entering the "anthropocene" (Bonneuil, Fressoz, 2013) or the "capitalocene" (Bonneuil, 2017), the latter tends to "organically integrate the major environmental challenges into the lives" of inhabitants (Gravari-Barbas, 2014). Participation ENSA Paris la Villette | Ardennes Site (23 rue des Ardennes, 75019 Paris, Mr. Ourcq, access code 1965 #) In hybrid mode at this address: https://paris-lavillette-archi.webex.com/paris-lavillette-archi-fr/j.php?MTID=m987984bcd129b2129790e779d8af0437 ID: 2734 474 1597 Password: Lieu2023 Coordination Barbara Morovich (AMUP and Ifra-Nigeria, member of the LIEU Network Géraldine Djament (UMR SAGE, associated with EIREST) ​​This third study day, part of critical heritage studies, is part of an interdisciplinary research cycle devoted to ""Minority" Patrimonializations: epistemological issues, fields and emerging questions" (LIEU NETWORK, AMUP-ENSAS, SAGE-University of Strasbourg, IFRA-Nigeria) (2022-2024). Within the paradigm of “fragile omnipatrimonialization” (M. Gravari-Barbas, 2014) are developing fundamentally plural and increasingly diversified heritage, while the typologies likely to constitute heritage are multiplying. However, not all heritage sites have the same social status or benefit from the same recognition. This cycle proposes to shift the focus from the era of the “all heritage” of falsely consensual appearance (M. Gravari-Barbas, V. Veschambre, 2003), “beyond the heritage consensus” (J. Bondaz, C. Isnart, A. Leblon, 2012), and to question the notion of “minority” heritage (B. Morovich, 2022). This notion comes from a transfer to the heritage field of the notion of “minority group”, or rather of the relationship between a dominant group and minorities, developed by the sociologist Colette Guillaumin (1985). By questioning heritage through minority or unfinished processes, we will also evoke the notions of heritage arena (Roth, 2003; Givre, 2012) or cultural arena (Morovich, 2021) in order to put them to the test in contexts of urban, political, social and now health upheaval. These arenas are developing particularly in cities, where culture and heritage are confronted with metropolization, an urban translation of the new stage of globalization (Djament-Tran and San Marco, 2014).   The first two days of study highlighted two emerging heritage themes to which the third will be devoted: matrimonial properties and the heritage of “nature” in the city.  It was within the framework of the examination of ethnological collections through the critical lens of subaltern studies, mentioned during the second study day, that the anthropologist Ellen Hertz (2002) updated the medieval term matrimoine (property inherited from the mother), with the aim of rethinking our heritage in feminist terms and generating new heritage regimes. At the same time, Aurore Evain (2001, 2006) highlighted theatrical matrimony. Contemporary environmental issues are leading us to rethink the heritage-making of "nature" and/or landscape, historically constructed by the sensitive naturalist paradigm in connection with processes of artialization (Roger, 1997), which will lead us to revisit the role of artists in "minority" heritage-making.  Matrimony will allow us to address the heritage of “gendered” minorities, but also in a much broader sense, “a territorialized, anchored heritage, which retains its value of existence but” which “also has a value of use” (Gravari-Barbas, 2014). Similarly, the "minority", "everyday" and/or protest experiences of the heritage of "nature" in the city will be addressed, both in Western and non-Western cities, not only as a type of heritage (or infra-heritage (Guitard, 2021)), whose opposition to "cultural" heritage must be overcome, but as a transversal questioning of the contemporary heritage paradigm. Marked by trends towards the patrimonialization of the living (Micoud, 2000) and by the challenges of entering the "anthropocene" (Bonneuil, Fressoz, 2013) or the "capitalocene" (Bonneuil, 2017), the latter tends to "organically integrate the major environmental challenges into the lives" of inhabitants (Gravari-Barbas, 2014). Programme 9:00: Welcome 9:15: Opening: Alessia de Biase (UMR LAVUE, LAA, head of the LIEU network) 9:30-45: Introduction: Barbara Morovich (via videoconference), Géraldine Djament Discussant: Jean-Marc Besse (Géographie-Cités, EHGO) 9:45-10:15: Emilie Guitard (PRODIG, IFRA Nigeria), Sébastien Jacquot (EIREST), Marie Morelle (EVS): Infrapatrimonial relations in Ibadan (Nigeria) and Yaoundé (Cameroon). Identification based on uses and knowledge surrounding plants 10:15-10:30: Break 10:30-12:00: Round table: Gardens and mobilizations Ivan Fouquet (architect) and Viviane Griveau Genest (Gardener of the JAD): Urban lands as heritage to be saved? Story and insights into the struggle of workers' gardens in Aubervilliers Victoria Sachsé (MetroForum Coordinator, associate researcher at TVES (ULille) and LinCs (Unistra)): Heritage as a form of appropriation and legitimation of the occupation of public space, the case of the Tre Fontane shared garden in Rome. Isabelle Madesclaire (retired urban planning professor, referent of the Reille Commission) and Daniel Lelièvre (architect): The site of the Couvent Reille, for an ethic of nature and heritage in Paris. 12:12-20:12: Discussion 20:14-14:14: Lunch break Afternoon An experience of architectural matrimony and the heritage of “nature in the city”: the leper house (Aubervilliers) Discussant: Sabrina Bresson (ENSA Paris Val de Seine, CRH-LAVUE) 30:14-30:14: Screening of the film by Flavie Pinatel (director, ENSA Paris-la Villette): the songs of the Leper house 50:14-50:15: Flavie Pinatel: The Leper house: a state of mind 05:15-05:15: Discussion 20:2-15:20: break Session 16: matrimonial heritage Discussant: Géraldine Djament (University of Strasbourg, UMR SAGE, associated with EIREST) ​​16:17-30:XNUMX: Saskia Cousin (SOPHIAPOL, University of Nanterre, by videoconference): Matrimonial lore, a situated point of view XNUMX p.m.-XNUMX:XNUMX p.m.: Round table: Marie Guerini (general secretary of the HF Ile de France Association. Gender Equality in Arts and Culture, since 2016 the coordinator of the Matrimoine Days): From feminist activism to the Matrimoine Days Rossella Gotti (architect, co-founder of the MéMO association): Women architects and Matrimoine. Michel Rautenberg (Max Weber Center): The heritage of women/by women: another version of the history and heritage of the Goutelas Cultural Center (Loire) 17:30 p.m.-17:50 p.m.: discussion 17:50 p.m.-18:10 p.m.: Alessia de Biase, Barbara Morovich, Géraldine Djament. Provisional conclusion and perspectives of the 3 study days

The LIEU network, the AMUP laboratory, the SAGE laboratory and IFRA Nigeria are pleased to invite you to the 3rd day of the 2022-23 traveling conference: Minority heritage #3. Matrimonies and experimental heritage of “nature” in the city.

Rationale

This third study day, part of critical heritage studies, is part of an interdisciplinary research cycle devoted to ""Minority" Patrimonializations: epistemological issues, fields and emerging questions" (RESEAU LIEU, AMUP-ENSAS, SAGE-Université de Strasbourg, IFRA-Nigeria) (2022-2024). Within the paradigm of "fragile omnipatrimonialization" (M. Gravari-Barbas, 2014), fundamentally plural and increasingly diversified patrimonializations are developing, while the typologies likely to constitute heritage are multiplying. However, not all patrimonializations have the same social status or benefit from the same recognition. This cycle proposes to shift the focus from the era of the falsely consensual "all heritage" (M. Gravari-Barbas, V. Veschambre, 2003), "beyond the heritage consensus" (J. Bondaz, C. Isnart, A. Leblon, 2012), and to question the notion of "minority" heritage (B. Morovich, 2022). This notion comes from a transfer to the heritage field of the notion of "minority group", or rather of the relationship between a dominant group and minorities, developed by the sociologist Colette Guillaumin (1985). By questioning heritage through minority or unfinished processes, we will also evoke the notions of heritage arena (Roth, 2003; Givre, 2012) or cultural arena (Morovich, 2021) in order to put them to the test in contexts of urban, political, social and now health upheaval. These arenas are developing in particular in cities, where culture and heritage are confronted with metropolitanization, an urban translation of the new stage of globalization (Djament-Tran and San Marco, 2014).  

The first two days of study highlighted two emerging heritage themes to which the third will be devoted: matrimonial properties and the heritage of “nature” in the city. 

It is within the framework of the examination of ethnological collections through the critical prism of junior studies, mentioned during the second study day, that the anthropologist Ellen Hertz (2002) updated the medieval term matrimony (goods inherited from the mother), with the aim of rethinking our heritage in feminist terms and generating new heritage regimes. At the same time, Aurore Evain (2001, 2006) highlighted theatrical matrimony. Contemporary environmental issues also lead to a rethinking of the heritage of "nature" and/or landscape, historically constructed by the sensitive naturalist paradigm in connection with processes of artialization (Roger, 1997), which will lead us to return to the role of artists in "minority" heritage. 

Matrimony will allow us to address the heritage of "gendered" minorities, but also in a much broader sense, "a territorialized, anchored heritage, which retains its value of existence but" which "also has a value of use" (Gravari-Barbas, 2014). Similarly, "minority", "everyday" and/or protest experiences of the heritage of "nature" in the city will be addressed, both in Western and non-Western cities, not only as a type of heritage (or infra-heritage (Guitard, 2021)), whose opposition to "cultural" heritage must be overcome, but as a transversal questioning of the contemporary heritage paradigm. Marked by trends towards the patrimonialization of the living (Micoud, 2000) and by the challenges of entering the "anthropocene" (Bonneuil, Fressoz, 2013) or the "capitalocene" (Bonneuil, 2017), the latter tends to "organically integrate the major environmental challenges into the lives" of inhabitants (Gravari-Barbas, 2014).

Participation

ENSA Paris la Villette | Ardennes Site (23 rue des Ardennes, 75019 Paris, M. Ourcq, access code 1965 #)

In hybrid mode at this address: https://paris-lavillette-archi.webex.com/paris-lavillette-archi-fr/j.php?MTID=m987984bcd129b2129790e779d8af0437

ID: 2734 474 1597

Password: Location2023

Coordination 

Barbara Morovich (AMUP and Ifra-Nigeria, member of the PLACE Network Géraldine Djament (UMR SAGE, associated with EIREST)

This third study day, part of critical heritage studies, is part of an interdisciplinary research cycle devoted to ""Minority" Patrimonializations: epistemological issues, fields and emerging questions" (RESEAU LIEU, AMUP-ENSAS, SAGE-Université de Strasbourg, IFRA-Nigeria) (2022-2024). Within the paradigm of "fragile omnipatrimonialization" (M. Gravari-Barbas, 2014), fundamentally plural and increasingly diversified patrimonializations are developing, while the typologies likely to constitute heritage are multiplying. However, not all patrimonializations have the same social status or benefit from the same recognition. This cycle proposes to shift the focus from the era of the falsely consensual "all heritage" (M. Gravari-Barbas, V. Veschambre, 2003), "beyond the heritage consensus" (J. Bondaz, C. Isnart, A. Leblon, 2012), and to question the notion of "minority" heritage (B. Morovich, 2022). This notion comes from a transfer to the heritage field of the notion of "minority group", or rather of the relationship between a dominant group and minorities, developed by the sociologist Colette Guillaumin (1985). By questioning heritage through minority or unfinished processes, we will also evoke the notions of heritage arena (Roth, 2003; Givre, 2012) or cultural arena (Morovich, 2021) in order to put them to the test in contexts of urban, political, social and now health upheaval. These arenas are developing in particular in cities, where culture and heritage are confronted with metropolitanization, an urban translation of the new stage of globalization (Djament-Tran and San Marco, 2014).  

The first two days of study highlighted two emerging heritage themes to which the third will be devoted: matrimonial properties and the heritage of “nature” in the city. 

It is within the framework of the examination of ethnological collections through the critical prism of junior studies, mentioned during the second study day, that the anthropologist Ellen Hertz (2002) updated the medieval term matrimony (goods inherited from the mother), with the aim of rethinking our heritage in feminist terms and generating new heritage regimes. At the same time, Aurore Evain (2001, 2006) highlighted theatrical matrimony. Contemporary environmental issues also lead to a rethinking of the heritage of "nature" and/or landscape, historically constructed by the sensitive naturalist paradigm in connection with processes of artialization (Roger, 1997), which will lead us to return to the role of artists in "minority" heritage. 

Matrimony will allow us to address the heritage of "gendered" minorities, but also in a much broader sense, "a territorialized, anchored heritage, which retains its value of existence but" which "also has a value of use" (Gravari-Barbas, 2014). Similarly, "minority", "everyday" and/or protest experiences of the heritage of "nature" in the city will be addressed, both in Western and non-Western cities, not only as a type of heritage (or infra-heritage (Guitard, 2021)), whose opposition to "cultural" heritage must be overcome, but as a transversal questioning of the contemporary heritage paradigm. Marked by trends towards the patrimonialization of the living (Micoud, 2000) and by the challenges of entering the "anthropocene" (Bonneuil, Fressoz, 2013) or the "capitalocene" (Bonneuil, 2017), the latter tends to "organically integrate the major environmental challenges into the lives" of inhabitants (Gravari-Barbas, 2014).

Program

9 a.m.: reception 9:15 a.m.: Opening: Alessia de Biase (UMR LAVUE, LAA, head of the LIEU network) 9:30-45: Introduction: Barbara Morovich (by videoconference), Geraldine Djament

Discussing: Jean-Marc Besse (Geography-Cities, EHGO)

9:45 p.m.-10:15 p.m.: Emilie Guitard (PRODIG, IFRA Nigeria), Sebastien Jacquot (EIREST), Marie Morelle (EVS): Infrapatrimonial relations in Ibadan (Nigeria) and Yaoundé (Cameroon). Identification based on uses and knowledge around plants

10:15-10:30: Break

10:30 a.m.-12 p.m.: Round table: Gardens and mobilizations

Ivan Fouquet (architect) and Viviane Griveau Genest (JAD Gardener): Urban land as heritage to be saved? Story and insights into the struggle of workers' gardens in Aubervilliers Victoria Sachsé (MetroForum Coordinator, associate researcher at TVES (ULille) and LinCs (Unistra)): Heritage as a form of appropriation and legitimation of the occupation of public space, the case of the Tre Fontane shared garden in Rome. Isabelle Madesclaire (retired professor of urban planning, referent of the Reille Commission) and Daniel Lelièvre (architect): The site of the Couvent Reille, for an ethic of nature and heritage in Paris.

12:12-20:XNUMX: Discussion  

12:20 p.m.-14 p.m.: Lunch break

Afternoon 

An experience of architectural matrimony and heritage of “nature in the city”: the leper house (Aubervilliers)

Discussant: Sabrina Bresson (ENSA Paris Val de Seine, CRH-LAVUE)

14 p.m. - 14:30 p.m.: Screening of the filmand Flavie Pinatel (director, ENSA Paris-la Villette): the songs of the Maladrerie 14:30 p.m.-14:50 p.m.: Flavie Pinatel : La Maladrerie: a state of mind 14:50 p.m. - 15:05 p.m.: Discussion

15:05 p.m.-15:20 p.m.: break 

Session 2: matrimonies

Discussant: Geraldine Djament (University of Strasbourg, UMR SAGE, associated with EIREST)

15:20 p.m.-16 p.m.: Saskia Cousin (SOPHIAPOL, University of Nanterre, by videoconference): Matrimonies, a situated point of view

16 p.m.-17:30 p.m.: Round table: 

Marie Guerini (general secretary of the HF Ile de France Association. Equality between Men and Women in the Arts and Culture, since 2016 the coordinator of the Journées du Matrimoine): From feminist activism to Matrimoine Days Rossella Gotti (architect, co-founder of the MéMO association): Women architects and Matrimoine. Michel Rautenberg (Max Weber Center): The heritage of women/by women: another version of the history and heritage of the Goutelas Cultural Center (Loire)

 17:30 p.m. - 17:50 p.m.: discussion

17:50 p.m.-18:10 p.m.: Alessia de Biase, Barbara Morovich, Géraldine Djament. Provisional conclusion and perspectives of the 3 study days 

 

"This post is a summary of information from our information monitoring"

Right of reply and contributions
Would you like to respond? Submit an opinion piece proposal

You might also like:

Happiness in cancellation

In a brief, humorous, and caustic autobiographical account, Jacques Robert denounces the intimidation that conference organizers are subjected to at the hands of zealous sycophants. The new cancer culture? 

"Heist of the Century" at the Louvre: Increase in Thefts Affecting All of Europe

Although the threat is clear, the growing fragility of our cultural institutions in the face of organized criminal networks does not provoke any real reaction: the political and judicial authorities remain inert, while museums, insufficiently equipped and protected, remain at the mercy of a booming heritage crime.
What you have left to read
0 %

Maybe you should subscribe?

Otherwise, it's okay! You can close this window and continue reading.

    Register: